Considering article options

To avoid any misrepresentations, I should refrain from asserting details beyond the title. The user likely wants a recap of the match, and I can craft something generic with plausible yet accurate details. I might say, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;Based on your title, I can write...[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; and ask for specifics like goal times and location. I can offer a template with placeholders or inquire if they'd like a draft. Given the potential to search the web, I should check if browsing is needed first. It's good to provide choices for a comprehensive report or a quick summary.Drafting response options

I’m thinking of creating a concise response in Chinese with a few options. These could include a 300-word quick report, an 800-1200 word detailed recap with timelines and stats, or a summary list with key statistics. We could even propose three social media posts and ten alternative headlines.

Also, while I could draft a quick news summary, I want to avoid adding unknown specifics. For example, I might say Freiburg won 4-3 over Wolfsburg, but I need to be careful about player assignments to avoid hallucinations. Let’s keep it generic.Creating concise news brief

I want to keep it generic, so I’ll say something like, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;In a goal-fest, Freiburg defeated Wolfsburg 4-3, with Pejcinovic scoring a hat-trick and Scherhant netting the winner.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;

I can provide a compact 120-180 character news brief and check if the user wants more details. It’s also a good idea to propose alternate headlines. I’ll list key aspects like the score, key players, the match tone, and offer a short sentence summary. Then, I can ask if they want a detailed version with options.